Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
en:language_thought_hypothesis [2024/08/05 07:20] – brahmantra | en:language_thought_hypothesis [2024/10/14 14:04] () – removed brahmantra | ||
---|---|---|---|
1: | 1: | ||
- | ====== LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT HYPOTHESIS ====== | ||
- | |||
- | There are various theories about the relation between language and thought. One prominent version in contemporary philosophy is called the language of thought hypothesis. It states that thinking happens in the medium of a mental language. This language, often referred to as Mentalese, is similar to regular languages in various respects: it is composed of words that are connected to each other in syntactic ways to form sentences. This claim does not merely rest on an intuitive analogy between language and thought. Instead, it provides a clear definition of the features a representational system has to embody in order to have a linguistic structure. On the level of syntax, the representational system has to possess two types of representations: | ||
- | |||
- | The language of thought hypothesis states that the same is true for thinking in general. This would mean that thought is composed of certain atomic representational constituents that can be combined as described above. Apart from this abstract characterization, | ||
- | |||
- | Computationalists have been especially interested in the language of thought hypothesis since it provides ways to close the gap between thought in the human brain and computational processes implemented by computers. The reason for this is that processes over representations that respect syntax and semantics, like inferences according to the modus ponens, can be implemented by physical systems using causal relations. The same linguistic systems may be implemented through different material systems, like brains or computers. In this way, computers can think. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== ALPHABET OF HUMAN THOUGHT | ||
- | |||
- | The alphabet of human thought (Latin: alphabetum cogitationum humanarum) is a concept originally proposed by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz that provides a universal way to represent and analyze ideas and relationships by breaking down their component pieces. All ideas are compounded from a very small number of simple ideas which can be represented by a unique character. | ||
- | |||